04-22-2010,12:57 AM

Originally Posted by
cozmic512
this is an interesting thing.
and I wanted to say that in america, there arent many cars that can claim anything close to that. of course its one of the reasons I have an E30 M3. as adam said earlier, It was built as a race car and then made into a street car to conform to the rules.
One car we had here in america like this was the celica alltrac or gt four.
they made a rally car and then made enough to homologate it for the rules to be eligible to race. a 2 liter awd rally car? whats that? only its a sports car not a sedan...
It was developed from the group b program and in 8 years in wrc competition won the drivers championship 5 times. Lancia was a juggernaut back then. and that is another car comparable to the e30 M3, the lancia delta. another homologated special.
no doubt, these are part of the reasons why we love these cars.
they are homologated race cars that a few, 5000 or so, average people can get their hands on and play with.
and anyone who has raced a bmw from a 2002 to an e90 knows,
they work on track.
my .02 cents.
I like the topic though, and I think everyone should be aware of history.
Cory
That's why I choose the ur Quattro...and own one.
I've made quite a few comparisons (naturally) after being a long time ur Quattro owner, and a relatively new M3 owner. They are such very much different cars, built for different types of racing (although the M3 performed wonderfully in rally)
But,
The history of both cars is well bred, and both cars have made great impacts to the sport, and the automotive world.
Both cars kicked major butt in motorsport. Both cars have the same dedicated following. Both cars can be driven daily, and turn heads everywhere they go.
Both cars instantly invoke a passion to those whom gaze upon them. (love them or hate them..people talk about them)
They have the same horsepower, and similar (not identical) body flares...and similar interiors. Both are easy to work on, and prices for parts are about the same.
Both the other E30's, and the Audi Coupe GT's an be robbed for parts...and share about the same number of parts of the M, and ur.
Both are homologated specials, and wasn't the M3 built exclusively by hand as well??(the Audi was)
I'd even say they were priced about the same?..and maybe similar production numbers? (15,000)
With both cars, the more you let them run, the more they give back to you. Both involve decent driving skill so you don't end up in the ditch, and take a bit of time to learn to PROPERLY drive. Both will bite you in the ass like a horse if you lose a firm hand of control.
Both are extremely rewarding cars to drive, despite the low (compared to current cars) horsepower.
The Sport Quattro isn't a good comparison in my book, as the SQ was UBER limited production, (<50) and had a price tag way, way beyond the M3. Still does. The power isn't a good comparison 300 vs. 200. The SQ on a long windy road is not a comfortable car...very twitchy, and a bit nerve wracking. Far from fun to drive on the open road.
Last edited by Sepp; 04-22-2010 at 01:25 AM.
I spend all my money on beer, cars, guitars, and women....the rest is just wasted.